There isn't a cafeteria, everyone has to bring their lunch. There are very strict food rules, of which will be...........
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (43)
I applaud the founder and the teacher of this one in a million schools for standing up and fighting back against the food industry. I only hope that the word spreads and that more educational facilities will change their habits.
- 8 votes
That is a good point. It did, indeed, sound like a privately funded school.
- 3 votes
if it's a public school it's a bad policy, but if you send your kid to a private school, you live with the school's policy.
- 4 votes
My granddaughter attends a private school....and they have the same policy, which is one of the reasons she is attending that school.
When she has to switch over to a public school....she will probably continue to take her lunch because she has not been raised on junk food and will not eat it.
- 3 votes
Sorry, but as much as I believe that schools should encourage good nutrition, this crosses the line. If the school only served food that met their requirements, that would be one thing. But to tell people that they cannot bring the food from home is over the top. Their rules border on Draconian - even a health-minded person would have trouble keeping up with requirements that strict (most organic foods would even be forbidden, according to the outlines). "Permitted" food must be VERY expensive, and you know the school isn't helping the families to foot the bills.
Policies like this only hurt their cause. If you want to police what the kids eat, open a damn cafeteria. I've never heard of a school without one.
- 9 votes
Do you also think it is over the top to not allow children to bring weapons to school?
Schools have a duty to protect student health. That is what they are doing.
- 3 votes
Weapons and food are two completely different issues. One cheeseburger a year won't kill you. One bullet could. Besides, weapons are brought for the sole purpose of hurting another individual (whether it be for defense or otherwise - I won't get into that issue here). The purpose of food is to prevent hunger. There's no comparison.
- 8 votes
The purpose of food is to prevent hunger
Not in America. I don't believe the 400llb woman or the 200llb teen or the 150llb 10 year old have ever been hungry in their life.
In America, the purpose of food is taste and entertainment. And NO child eats just one hamburger. It would be one thing if parents only sent junk with their kids to school once a month -- but parents pack sh!t for their kids EVERYDAY.
Desperate times call for desperate measures. Americans don't know the meaning of moderation. Everything has to be extreme here: the fun and the consequences.
- 4 votes
We're Doomed, I like you and I respect your opinion. I just don't agree with it completely this time. I agree with trying to feed your children healthy food. I don't like other people telling me what I must feed my children.
For me, extremism in either direction is a bad thing. Moderation is the key to a happy life. I am an American and I'm intelligent enough to raise healthy children. Extremism gets my dander up.
- 5 votes
I agree with trying to feed your children healthy food. I don't like other people telling me what I must feed my children.
But you are okay with other people telling you what you cannot feed your children (arsenic, alcohol...)? =)
In reality, I think it is strange not to have a cafeteria. I don't think there is anything wrong with the school saying the children cannot bring junk food to school. Parents are welcome to feed their children as much junk as they want at home. No one is stopping them from doing that. But school should be a haven of health and learning.
But the school should provide the healthy options at the school. This school is not the optimal.
- 4 votes
.....Yes, let us not feed the children arsenic...... Whether you like my opinion or not.....
- 2 votes
.....Yes, let us not feed the children arsenic...... Whether you like my opinion or not.....
hehehe. If you can't have a sense of humor, what can you have?
- 5 votes
weRdoomed, I see your point and respect your opinion. I really do. My issue is that if the school wants the children to adhere to this diet, they should be the ones providing the food for them. They shouldn't be demanding that the parents fork over the money for this pricey health food. I know that lots of parents feed their kids crap these days, and I agree that they should feed their kids healthy food. But the school's rules on what is healthy is over-the-top, IMO, and they can make shopping very difficult for even a health-conscious consumer. I don't know anything about the general area this school is in, but do all the families even have regular access to foods that healthy?
Like I said earlier, I've never heard of a school without a cafeteria. If they want to encourage healthy eating, that should be where they do it. They can teach kids how to read food labels and know what's in their food. But they shouldn't be in their parents' kitchens.
- 2 votes
There is something odd about this. What the school is requiring matches my own choices. I really believe we need to move our children in this direction. And it is a private school so the parents signed contracts and all like that. But it is odd to expect the parents to provide the food. It would seem so much easier to include this in the tuition and feed the children themselves. Maybe the idea is to educate the families. I applaud an idea like that. But I probably wouldn't send a child to this particular school because I think it's asking the families to step quite a distance out of their comfort zones and I wasn't reading in the article that the school is offering much in the way of support and education. A list doesn't really cut it.
- 2 votes
Not a new event in Az. Metro Art Academy in down Town Phoenix does the same thing. My kids love it.
- 1 vote
I must say, in certain ways I really agree with her. My little boy is really sensitive to sugar. It makes him nuts...no, CRAZY NUTS! I feed him breakfast at home and send him to school where he has lunch at school.
He came home crazy nuts one day and I asked him what he ate at school. He said for his SECOND BREAKFAST, he had a honey bun WITH SYRUP! And then got a regular hot lunch that wasn't bad. I couldn't believe he was buying breakfast at school, too! So, I went in and talked to his teacher. Chase won't be having any more of those honey buns dunking them in SYRUP! All their breakfast stuff is all sugar. Stuff I won't buy.. But, come on...a honey bun with syrup? YUCK@
On the other hand she's a bit of a food Nazi, isn't she? In Tucson there is a large Latino population. Those people are sending their children with what they eat every day. I don't think that's right. Who is she to tell these parents they can't feed their kids what they themselves eat...
I don't know...there's a fine line there, and for me, she crossed it.
- 4 votes
Ain't nothing wrong with teaching/forcing kids to eat good food.
But, unless the school bans Genetically modified "food," then what's the point? The kids are still being poisoned, just a little slower.
- 4 votes
I think their is a point where one becomes too healthy and this school is it. I have no problem seeing the school motivate this idea, but since when do you remove a burrito or quesdilla!? The substitute that was mentioned I would rather starve than eat, but of course that wouldn't be healthy.
- 4 votes
It's actually not a private school; it's a public charter school according to its website. I think the program is great. But I'm surprised they can get away with it since it still falls under the parameters of the government.
Here is a link to the "food rules" for the school. http://www.childrenssuccess.org/5-Nurtured_Body.htm
I'm sure eventually they will be sued and then the kids will be able to bring all the crap food they want. /sarc
- 3 votes
When my daughter was 8 she came home from school and said, "Momma, we have to read the labels" and we did. We sat down and discussed what we should do with the processed foods in our kitchen and decided they had to go. We made a deal with each other that on occasion when out we could chose our "treat" and it could be anything. She usually wanted a hamburger and I wanted a piece of chocolate cake. It is thirty-five years later two more children and three grandchildren and we are still very conscientious about the foods we bring into the house. No one on my side of the family has weight issues. I found that cutting out sugar and red meat was better for me. Refined sugar began to taste very metallic so I thought that was a good sign. As far as cost fresh fruits and vegetables, whole grains and dairy products such as cheese are very filling and sustaining so cost is not that big of an issue. Learning to cook without disasters? Well, that took a while.
- 5 votes
Thanks, weRdoomed, What I found is that conferring with my children about nutrition and what is going to keep them healthy and feeling good was a great idea. My son had a period of time where he got a bit nutritionally lazy and his naturopathic student friends took him to task. He lost 30 pounds and stopped doing the "grab something I'm hungry" thing to eating more nutritional meals. He was here in the summer for a visit and I was so happy he was hanging on and back to being conscientious about his food choices. I am not a purest by any means but I believe that 99% of the time feed your body what it needs and 1% eat whatever your brain is craving even if it is Cheetos or a Hostess Cupcake. It won't kill you to give your body a party once in a while just don't party all of the time.
- 4 votes
It won't kill you to give your body a party once in a while
Coolest sentence. ever. I want to give my body a party. =)
- 3 votes
Wow! It is a bit extreme but really gives the kids a good understanding of what not to do. It may work, in the long term, as well as abstinence only sex ed.
- 2 votes
Great comment, 3rdtime. I know from experience that "forbidding" is not a good route to go in any human activity as it only makes us crave the forbidden.
- 1 vote
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



